<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beautifying York Lists with AJAX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.breakzdjs.com/2009/02/02/beautifying-york-lists-with-ajax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.breakzdjs.com/2009/02/02/beautifying-york-lists-with-ajax/</link>
	<description>: Electronic music in York . Drum &#38; Bass . Dubstep</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.breakzdjs.com/2009/02/02/beautifying-york-lists-with-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakzdjs.com/2009/02/02/beautifying-york-lists-with-ajax/#comment-377</guid>
		<description>Thanks and I hope it&#039;s useful.  Having written the code, it seemed silly not to offer it to other lists users.  

Yes, it occurred to me after writing it that I could actually have done it all on the server instead of the AJAX proxy.  (Don&#039;t know why I didn&#039;t think of that at the time actually.)  Though the AJAX bit does of course make it twice as shiny... :)

It would have been nice to intercept the confirmation screen as that&#039;s a bit clunky too, but I couldn&#039;t think of a way to do that.  

Hope you manage to get your code back on the G&amp;S site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks and I hope it&#8217;s useful.  Having written the code, it seemed silly not to offer it to other lists users.  </p>
<p>Yes, it occurred to me after writing it that I could actually have done it all on the server instead of the AJAX proxy.  (Don&#8217;t know why I didn&#8217;t think of that at the time actually.)  Though the AJAX bit does of course make it twice as shiny&#8230; :)</p>
<p>It would have been nice to intercept the confirmation screen as that&#8217;s a bit clunky too, but I couldn&#8217;t think of a way to do that.  </p>
<p>Hope you manage to get your code back on the G&amp;S site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Houston</title>
		<link>http://www.breakzdjs.com/2009/02/02/beautifying-york-lists-with-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakzdjs.com/2009/02/02/beautifying-york-lists-with-ajax/#comment-376</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for that, that&#039;s a pretty slick solution. I came to the same conclusion about the lists interface being ugly when I was webmaster for the G&amp;S website a while back, but I did it server-side instead, generating a new email to the list server from the email address supplied by the user.

It seems to have got lost in the transition to the new template for our site sadly, I&#039;ve been meaning to ask the new webmaster where it&#039;s gone... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for that, that&#8217;s a pretty slick solution. I came to the same conclusion about the lists interface being ugly when I was webmaster for the G&amp;S website a while back, but I did it server-side instead, generating a new email to the list server from the email address supplied by the user.</p>
<p>It seems to have got lost in the transition to the new template for our site sadly, I&#8217;ve been meaning to ask the new webmaster where it&#8217;s gone&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

